MARQUEZ v. U.S., 07 CR 286 LH (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20161107c58
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY TO THE UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court and the Court being fully aware of the circumstances including Assistant United States Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez having no objection to the extension of time for the filing of petitioner's reply to the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 an
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY TO THE UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court and the Court being fully aware of the circumstances including Assistant United States Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez having no objection to the extension of time for the filing of petitioner's reply to the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 and..
More
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY TO THE UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court and the Court being fully aware of the circumstances including Assistant United States Attorney Alexander M.M. Uballez having no objection to the extension of time for the filing of petitioner's reply to the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and Motion for Stay of Proceedings until the Tenth Circuit issues its Opinion in United States v. Maldonado-Palma, finds that good cause exists to grant Mr. Marquez' motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that counsel for Mr. Marquez be allowed until December 5, 2016, to file his reply in this matter.
Source: Leagle