Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Scott v. Harrigan, 9:13-CV-1368(DNH/DEP) (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. New York Number: infdco20160307920 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2016
Summary: DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD , District Judge . Pro se plaintiff Lee Scott brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On February 10, 2016, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, and the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. See ECF No. 24. Neither party timely filed objections. Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-R
More

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Lee Scott brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 10, 2016, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted, and the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. See ECF No. 24. Neither party timely filed objections.

Based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and

2. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer