Forsythe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 3:18-cv-00186-RCJ-WGC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181109g72
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE ROBERT C. JONES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs James W. Forsythe, Earlene Forsythe, and James W. and Earlene Forsythe, Trustees of the James W. and Earlene Forsythe Trust Dated June 30 1997 (collectively, "Plaintiffs) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), acting through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. All claims asserted (or which could have been asserted) by Plaintiffs
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE ROBERT C. JONES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs James W. Forsythe, Earlene Forsythe, and James W. and Earlene Forsythe, Trustees of the James W. and Earlene Forsythe Trust Dated June 30 1997 (collectively, "Plaintiffs) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), acting through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. All claims asserted (or which could have been asserted) by Plaintiffs ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE
ROBERT C. JONES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs James W. Forsythe, Earlene Forsythe, and James W. and Earlene Forsythe, Trustees of the James W. and Earlene Forsythe Trust Dated June 30 1997 (collectively, "Plaintiffs) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), acting through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. All claims asserted (or which could have been asserted) by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action as against Chase shall be dismissed, with prejudice; and,
2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs in connection with the abovecaptioned action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
