Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-2189 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 95-2189 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 13, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 89 F.3d 826 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Collin FEARON, Jr. and Bradshaw Samuels, Plaintiffs, Billy BILLUPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eugene S. LEFEVRE, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, J.W. Curran, Deputy Superintendent of Security Services, D
More

89 F.3d 826

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
Collin FEARON, Jr. and Bradshaw Samuels, Plaintiffs,
Billy BILLUPS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Eugene S. LEFEVRE, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional
Facility, J.W. Curran, Deputy Superintendent of Security
Services, D.A. McGuire, Deputy Superintendent of Program
Services, T. Howard, Vocational School Supervisor, Lee
Atkinson, Vocational School Instructor, Crane R. Rock,
Substitute Vocational School Instructor, P. Welch,
Chairperson of the Program Committee, J.J. Woods,
Corrections Officer, R. Cox, Correspondence Supervisor, D.P.
Maggy, Corrections Officer, Peter J. Paulson, Director of
the New York State Library, New York State, Stephanie
Weldon, Law Librarian, Thomas A. Coughlin, III,
Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services, Marion
Borum, Deputy Commissioner of Programs, Leo Risceglia,
Inspector General, John McCay, Coordinator of Law Libraries,
Paul Garcia, Jr., Director, Inmate Grievance Program, Kevin
McNiff, Chairman, State Commission of Corrections, Katharine
Webb, Commissioner, J.E. Sullivan, ex-Deputy Superintendent
of Security Services, M. O'Connor, Senior Corrections
Counselor, R.J. Wolcott, Sergeant, L. Wilson, Sergeant, Roy
Lahart, Jr., Academic School Supervisor, Jean Schneider,
Vocational School Instructor, Mike Raciot, Vocational School
Instructor, Dan Johnson, Substitute Vocational School
Instructor, Linda Campbell, Corrections Counselor, L.
Wilson, Corrections Counselor, D. Albreach, Academic School
Counselor, Steven Jenette, Corrections Officer, L. Harvey,
Corrections Officer, Henry C. Briquer, Notary Public, S.J.
Rebideau, Corrections Officer in charge of IGRC, Ken Davies,
Corrections Officer, George Rodriguez, Corrections Officer,
Keith Reyell, Corrections Officer, F. Facteau, Corrections
Officer, Rodney Moody, Inmate Records Coordinator, R.B.
Bombard, Corrections Officer, E.R. Dubrey, Corrections
Officer, D. Premore, Corrections Officer, G. Decille,
Corrections Officer, B. Laventure, Corrections Officer, J.
Stinson, Corrections Officer, C.J. Kelly, Corrections
Officer, C. Rodriguez, Corrections Officer D. Luca,
Corrections Officer, G. Geraldmathos, Corrections Officer,
Donald Wirthshafter, President of Lockrow's Inc., L.H.
Douglas, Postmaster, U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2189.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1995.

Appearing for Appellant: Billy Billups, pro se, Stormville, N.Y.

Appearing for Appellees: Andrea Oser, Assistant Attorney General, Albany, N.Y.

Present LUMBARD, KEARSE and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

1

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff-appellant pro se and by counsel for defendants-appellees.

2

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Baer's Order and Opinion dated March 15, 1995. In addition, we note that proof of negligence would not suffice to establish a deprivation of due process, see, e.g., Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986); Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344 (1986), and that the record provides no basis for an inference that nondelivery of the letter in question was the result of any intentional wrongdoing, rather than negligence.

3

We have considered all of plaintiff's contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer