Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miceli v. Nexus Energy Systems, Inc., 19-1122 WJ/GBW. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20200311d40 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT GREGORY B. WORMUTH , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Doc. 22 . As required by Local Rule 7.1(a), Plaintiff states that he attempted to obtain the concurrence of Defendants to the present motion but that Defendants opposed the relief requested. Id. at 1. In their response, however, Defendants do not articulate any opposition to Plaintiff's requested relief. Doc. 23 .
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Doc. 22. As required by Local Rule 7.1(a), Plaintiff states that he attempted to obtain the concurrence of Defendants to the present motion but that Defendants opposed the relief requested. Id. at 1. In their response, however, Defendants do not articulate any opposition to Plaintiff's requested relief. Doc. 23.

The Court should "freely give leave" to amend pleadings "when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). Because Defendants do not state any opposition to Plaintiff's requested relief, the Court will GRANT the motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file his First Amended Complaint (doc. 22-1).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer