MAYS v. COURT SERVICES, INC., 09-662 KG/KBM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20140826a30
Visitors: 28
Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALEZ, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on (1) Defendant Court Services, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (2) Defendant CSI Extraction [sic] LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. (Docs. 156 and 157). Plaintiff Magan Marie Mays responded to these motions for partial summary judgment by noting that s
Summary: ORDER KENNETH J. GONZALEZ, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on (1) Defendant Court Services, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (2) Defendant CSI Extraction [sic] LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. (Docs. 156 and 157). Plaintiff Magan Marie Mays responded to these motions for partial summary judgment by noting that sh..
More
ORDER
KENNETH J. GONZALEZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on (1) Defendant Court Services, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and (2) Defendant CSI Extraction [sic] LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. (Docs. 156 and 157). Plaintiff Magan Marie Mays responded to these motions for partial summary judgment by noting that she is not bringing an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against either of these Defendants. (Doc. 167). See also (Doc. 123) at ¶¶ 23-26. That being the case, the Court denies the motions for partial summary judgment.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Court Services, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Doc. 156) is denied; and
2. Defendant CSI Extraction [sic] LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claim for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Doc. 157) is denied.
Source: Leagle