Trimm v. M&W Transportation Co., 4:18-CV-45-DMB-JMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20191122c44
Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASES DEBRA M. BROWN , District Judge . On November 14, 2019, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice" was filed in the Trimm case, which is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared and states that the "case has been compromised and settled among the parties and that the case ... is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs." See No. 4:18-cv-46, at Doc. #54. Also on November 14, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASES DEBRA M. BROWN , District Judge . On November 14, 2019, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice" was filed in the Trimm case, which is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared and states that the "case has been compromised and settled among the parties and that the case ... is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs." See No. 4:18-cv-46, at Doc. #54. Also on November 14, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)..
More
ORDER CLOSING CASES
DEBRA M. BROWN, District Judge.
On November 14, 2019, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice" was filed in the Trimm case, which is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared and states that the "case has been compromised and settled among the parties and that the case ... is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs." See No. 4:18-cv-46, at Doc. #54. Also on November 14, a "Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice" was filed in the Langston case, which is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared and states that the "case has been compromised and settled among the parties and that the case ... is hereby, dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs." See No. 4:18cv-45, at Doc. #43.
Accordingly, both the Trimm case and the Langston case are CLOSED.1
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. A motion to approve settlement was filed and granted only in the Trimm case. See No. 4:18-cv-46, at Docs. #52 (motion requesting approval), #53 (order approving settlement). Regardless, both cases may be closed on the Court's active docket based on the representations that settlements were reached.
Source: Leagle
