JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY v. McCOY, 32 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Number: innmco20130919279
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2013
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge. { 1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons s
Summary: This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. MEMORANDUM OPINION WECHSLER, Judge. { 1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons st..
More
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{¶ 1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{¶ 2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
{¶ 3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, concurs.
Source: Leagle
