Gluck v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 19-Cv-9030 (RA). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200220f06
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . It has been reported to the Court that Plaintiff Avruhum Gluck and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any appl
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . It has been reported to the Court that Plaintiff Avruhum Gluck and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any appli..
More
ORDER
RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge.
It has been reported to the Court that Plaintiff Avruhum Gluck and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. have settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED that the above-captioned action as to Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and "so ordered" by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
