Filed: Sep. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM & ORDER JOANNA SEYBERT , District Judge . On March 22, 2019, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's claims against defendant Carol Hall without prejudice and with leave to amend. ( See Mem. & Order, D.E. 27.) The Court warned Plaintiff that "failure to file an Amended Complaint under Docket No. 16-CV-2632 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order will result in dismissal of the case with prejudice" and "his failure to timely file an Amended Complaint will lead to the dismissal
Summary: MEMORANDUM & ORDER JOANNA SEYBERT , District Judge . On March 22, 2019, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's claims against defendant Carol Hall without prejudice and with leave to amend. ( See Mem. & Order, D.E. 27.) The Court warned Plaintiff that "failure to file an Amended Complaint under Docket No. 16-CV-2632 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order will result in dismissal of the case with prejudice" and "his failure to timely file an Amended Complaint will lead to the dismissal ..
More
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOANNA SEYBERT, District Judge.
On March 22, 2019, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's claims against defendant Carol Hall without prejudice and with leave to amend. (See Mem. & Order, D.E. 27.) The Court warned Plaintiff that "failure to file an Amended Complaint under Docket No. 16-CV-2632 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order will result in dismissal of the case with prejudice" and "his failure to timely file an Amended Complaint will lead to the dismissal of his complaint against Hall WITH PREJUDICE and the case will be closed." (Mem. & Order at 20, 19.)
Well over thirty days have elapsed since this Court's Order, and Plaintiff has not filed an Amended Complaint or otherwise taken any action to prosecute this case.1 Thus, in accordance with the prior Order, all claims against defendant Hall are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal taken from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45, 82 S.Ct. 917, 920-21, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).
The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff, to enter judgment accordingly, and to mark this case CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.
