Sutherland Global Services, Inc. v. Adam Technologies International, SA de C.V., 14-CV-6315CJS(P). (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. New York
Number: infdco20141030d28
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: DECISION and ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel (Docket No. 3). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), the Court may appoint counsel to assist indigent litigants. See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22 , 23 (2d Cir.1988). Plaintiff was denied permission to proceed as a poor person because she was not indigent. The application for appoint
Summary: DECISION and ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel (Docket No. 3). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), the Court may appoint counsel to assist indigent litigants. See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22 , 23 (2d Cir.1988). Plaintiff was denied permission to proceed as a poor person because she was not indigent. The application for appointm..
More
DECISION and ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel (Docket No. 3). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil cases. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court may appoint counsel to assist indigent litigants. See, e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22, 23 (2d Cir.1988). Plaintiff was denied permission to proceed as a poor person because she was not indigent. The application for appointment of counsel is, therefore, denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
