Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

95-2761 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 95-2761 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 25, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 101 F.3d 687 NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23. Manuel E. MATEO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, the New York City Department of Corrections, the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections, John Doe # 1, M.D., a Doctor at Kings Coun
More

101 F.3d 687

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.
Manuel E. MATEO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, the New York City Department of
Corrections, the Commissioner of the New York City
Department of Corrections, John Doe # 1, M.D., a Doctor at
Kings County Medical Center, John Doe # 2, a Correctional
Officer at Riker's Island Correctional Center Hospital, the
State of New York, Thomas A. Coughlin, III, Commissioner of
the New York State Department of Correctional Services, the
Governor of the State of New York, New York State Department
of Correctional Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2761.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 25, 1996.

Manuel E. Mateo pro se, Maline, NY, for appellant.

Elizabeth I. Freedman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, New York, NY, for appellees.

Before KEARSE, MAHONEY, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

1

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was submitted by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.

2

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Raggi's order dated September 18 1995. All of plaintiff's claims are barred by the statute of limitations.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer