Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hatfield v. U.S., 2:04-cr-00215-LDG-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160317888 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2016
Summary: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . COMES NOW, Thomas R. Hatfield, Petitioner, pro se in the above styled and entitled cause of action who moves the Court for leave to Reply to the Government's Response to his Motion to Terminate Supervised Release. Procedural History On June 16, 2015, Petitioner filed in this Court a Motion to Terminate Supervised Release citing inter alia the grounds for such a request. On June 17, 2015, The Government responded to the Motion i
More

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY

COMES NOW, Thomas R. Hatfield, Petitioner, pro se in the above styled and entitled cause of action who moves the Court for leave to Reply to the Government's Response to his Motion to Terminate Supervised Release.

Procedural History

On June 16, 2015, Petitioner filed in this Court a Motion to Terminate Supervised Release citing inter alia the grounds for such a request.

On June 17, 2015, The Government responded to the Motion in opposition to Petitioner Hatfield's request. Petitioner however did not learn of the entry of the Government's Response until several days ago when the case disposition was researched on Pacer.

Petitioner herein is requesting Leave of the Court to Reply to the Government's Response.

Premises Considered, Petitioner prays that the court will;

(a) Grant the Motion for Leave to Reply;

(b) Grant the Petitioner sixty (60) in which to submit a Reply, and Grant;

(c) Any other relief the Court deem just and proper to make.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer