Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robinson v. Section 23 Property Owner's Association, Inc., 1:18-cv-09658-NLH-JS. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. New Jersey Number: infdco20190204b59 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER NOEL L. HILLMAN , District Judge . For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed today, IT IS on this 31st day of January , 2019 ORDERED that Defendants David Keith Oaks, P.A. and Section 23's motions to vacate the clerk's entry of default entered against them [39, 75] be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas by Todd B. Miller [59] be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED tha
More

ORDER

For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed today,

IT IS on this 31st day of January, 2019

ORDERED that Defendants David Keith Oaks, P.A. and Section 23's motions to vacate the clerk's entry of default entered against them [39, 75] be, and the same hereby are, GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the MOTION to Quash/Compel/Enforce Subpoenas by Todd B. Miller [59] be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [18, 26, 27, 50, 63, 70, 84] be, and the same are, GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions [28, 74, 90, 92, 96] be, and the same hereby are, DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the MOTION for Sanctions by Section 23, Property Owner's Association, Inc. [84] be, and the same hereby is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants John Leo Burns and Lisa Marie Spader Porter's Motion to Stay [45] be, and the same hereby is, DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further

ORDERED that in the interests of repose, finality of judgments, protection of defendants from unwarranted harassment, and concern for maintaining order in the Court's dockets, Plaintiff is enjoined in this District from litigating his claims concerning the money laundering and fraud scheme alleged and as set forth in the Complaint in this matter against any defendant he believes is liable for that scheme without first obtaining permission from this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer