Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Konecranes Global Corporation v. Mode Tech Beijing Co., 2:18-cv-02015-GMN-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190412b09 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 46. The Court previously denied without prejudice the parties' request to stay discovery. Docket No. 45. The Court is not clear what the parties seek through the pending discovery plan, as it references the motion to dismiss and then seeks entry of "tentative" dates for a scheduling order. Docket No. 46 at 3. The Court hereby SETS this matter for a scheduling conference for 10:00
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan. Docket No. 46. The Court previously denied without prejudice the parties' request to stay discovery. Docket No. 45. The Court is not clear what the parties seek through the pending discovery plan, as it references the motion to dismiss and then seeks entry of "tentative" dates for a scheduling order. Docket No. 46 at 3. The Court hereby SETS this matter for a scheduling conference for 10:00 a.m. on April 30, 2019, in Courtroom 3A. To the extent the parties are seeking a stay of discovery, counsel shall be prepared to explain why a stay is appropriate under the applicable standards. To the extent the parties are not seeking a stay of discovery, counsel shall be prepared to address which deadlines should be set with the expectation that they will be met (i.e., not to be set "tentatively").

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer