MIELKE v. STANDARD METALS PROCESSING, INC., 2:14-cv-01763-JCM-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150914773
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 55) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend discovery cut-off date. Docket No. 55. The parties stipulation fails to comply with Local Rule 26-4. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, all requests to extend discovery deadlines must include, inter alia, a statement specifying the discovery completed and a specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed, as well as the reasons why the discovery was not completed wit
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 55) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend discovery cut-off date. Docket No. 55. The parties stipulation fails to comply with Local Rule 26-4. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, all requests to extend discovery deadlines must include, inter alia, a statement specifying the discovery completed and a specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed, as well as the reasons why the discovery was not completed with..
More
ORDER (Docket No. 55)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend discovery cut-off date. Docket No. 55.
The parties stipulation fails to comply with Local Rule 26-4. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-4, all requests to extend discovery deadlines must include, inter alia, a statement specifying the discovery completed and a specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed, as well as the reasons why the discovery was not completed within the time limits set forth in the scheduling order. The stipulation includes none of these statements. Accordingly the stipulation is hereby DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
