Filed: Oct. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2015
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONDUCT PRE-PLEA PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Eddie Junior Rodriguez, the Defendant in this case, through his attorney, Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Assistant Federal Public Defender, William Carrico, file this Motion to the Court to Order that a Presentence Investigation Report be conducted before a finding of guilt is made. This unopposed motion is made for the following reasons. UNOPPOSED MO
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONDUCT PRE-PLEA PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Eddie Junior Rodriguez, the Defendant in this case, through his attorney, Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Assistant Federal Public Defender, William Carrico, file this Motion to the Court to Order that a Presentence Investigation Report be conducted before a finding of guilt is made. This unopposed motion is made for the following reasons. UNOPPOSED MOT..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONDUCT PRE-PLEA PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Eddie Junior Rodriguez, the Defendant in this case, through his attorney, Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Assistant Federal Public Defender, William Carrico, file this Motion to the Court to Order that a Presentence Investigation Report be conducted before a finding of guilt is made. This unopposed motion is made for the following reasons.
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PREPARATION OF PRE-PLEA PSI
Eddy Rodriguez was charged by Complaint on December 30, 2014, with four counts of Robbery under the Hobbs Act. On January 21, 2015 Mr. Rodriguez was indicted on those same charges. The Parties agree that the case may be appropriate for disposition short of trial, and they agree that having a good understanding of this Defendant's Criminal History is important to a fair disposition of the case. Trial in this matter is set for January 25, 2015.
Despite the best efforts of the Parties, the information available from agency summaries and computer data bases regarding the Defendant's complete Criminal Histroy remains confusing and contradictory. A mistaken calculation could expose the Defendant to enhanced punishment. If not properly counseled, this could result in a plea that is uninformed as to the full consequences. Counsel for the Parties have informally inquired of the Office of U.S. Probation as to whether resources are available for the requested purpose and have been assured that such a request from the Court would not compromise efficiency or divert needed resources. For these reasons, the parties respectfully request that a pre-plea Presentence Investigation Report be conducted in this matter.
ORDER
The reasons being sound, the Parties being in agreement and the best interests of justice and judicial economy being served:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Probation Office prepare a Presentence Investigation Report in this case prior to a finding of guilt or entry of plea by the Defendant named above.
