AHMAD v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, 09-CV-3134(WFK)(LB). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20120126496
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, dated December 7, 2012, addressing the motion for summary judgment by Defendants The Port Authority of New York ("Port Authority"), Port Authority Police Officer Bernard Buckner ("Officer Buckner"), and Port Authority Police Officer Thomas Koster ("Officer Koster") (collectively the "Defendants"). No objections have been filed. This Court hereby adopts the Report an
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge. This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, dated December 7, 2012, addressing the motion for summary judgment by Defendants The Port Authority of New York ("Port Authority"), Port Authority Police Officer Bernard Buckner ("Officer Buckner"), and Port Authority Police Officer Thomas Koster ("Officer Koster") (collectively the "Defendants"). No objections have been filed. This Court hereby adopts the Report and..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, dated December 7, 2012, addressing the motion for summary judgment by Defendants The Port Authority of New York ("Port Authority"), Port Authority Police Officer Bernard Buckner ("Officer Buckner"), and Port Authority Police Officer Thomas Koster ("Officer Koster") (collectively the "Defendants"). No objections have been filed. This Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
The motion for summary judgment by the Defendants is DENIED as to the excessive force claim against Officer Buckner. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all other claims.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
