Filed: Nov. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 43 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff TODD VANDEHEY and Defendants, REAL SOCIAL DYNAMICS, INC., NICHOLAS KHO, and OWEN COOK, by and through their counsel as follows: On October 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Amend
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 43 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff TODD VANDEHEY and Defendants, REAL SOCIAL DYNAMICS, INC., NICHOLAS KHO, and OWEN COOK, by and through their counsel as follows: On October 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Amende..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 43
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, it is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff TODD VANDEHEY and Defendants, REAL SOCIAL DYNAMICS, INC., NICHOLAS KHO, and OWEN COOK, by and through their counsel as follows:
On October 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint (ECF No. 41). Defendants' response is currently due November 2, 2017. The undersigned agree to an extended briefing schedule such that Defendants' shall have until November 10, 2017, to file their response.
Also on October 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count One of the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 42). Defendants' response is currently due November 2, 2017. The undersigned agree to an extended briefing schedule such that Defendants' shall have until November 10, 2017, to file their response.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of time in which to answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. It is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice any party. Rather, the parties hereto agree to an extension in good faith due to the litigation work load of the parties and the excessive number of litigation matters currently in process for the parties.
ORDER
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants will have until 11/10/17 IT IS SO ORDERED to file their response. to the amended complaint [41] and their opposition to the motion for summary judgment [42]. Counsel is cautioned that, although a congested calendar with numerous deadlines may be good cause for a single extension of time, future requests for relief from deadlines on thisUbasis NITED willSTATESlikelyDISTRICTbe denied.JUDGEAlthough the court is sensitive to the occasional calendaring challenge, attorneys responsibleare for balancing workloadtheir and staffing needs to court-imposed deadlines are met.
