Washington v. U.S. Department of the Navy, 2:19-cv-01059-RAJ-JRC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20200124i11
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OUTSIDE OF CM/ECF J. RICHARD CREATURA , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendants' unopposed motion for leave to lodge the administrative record ("AR") in this matter outside CM/ECF. See Dkt. 24, at 1. Defendants request that they be allowed to file the AR—more than 180,000 pages—in electronic format (including a hyperlinked index), instead of on CM/ECF, and that they file only the certifications and indi
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OUTSIDE OF CM/ECF J. RICHARD CREATURA , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendants' unopposed motion for leave to lodge the administrative record ("AR") in this matter outside CM/ECF. See Dkt. 24, at 1. Defendants request that they be allowed to file the AR—more than 180,000 pages—in electronic format (including a hyperlinked index), instead of on CM/ECF, and that they file only the certifications and indic..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OUTSIDE OF CM/ECF
J. RICHARD CREATURA, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants' unopposed motion for leave to lodge the administrative record ("AR") in this matter outside CM/ECF. See Dkt. 24, at 1. Defendants request that they be allowed to file the AR—more than 180,000 pages—in electronic format (including a hyperlinked index), instead of on CM/ECF, and that they file only the certifications and indices to the AR through CM/ECF. See Dkt. 24.
Upon consideration, the undersigned finds good cause to grant the request and will allow defendants to file the AR as requested, subject to the following limitations. First, as outlined in defendants' request, copies of the AR itself must be provided to plaintiffs' counsel. See Dkt. 24-ORDER 1, at 1. Second, the Court reserves the right to modify this Order if the Court is unable to access the electronic copy of the AR that defendants provide. Third, defendants must still comply with the Court's prior order that they file one (1) combined Administrative Record in this matter. See Dkt. 22, at 1. To the extent possible, the AR should not include duplicate records. Fourth, all parties shall ensure that citations to the AR are specific, pinpoint citations and that the Court need not hunt through the record to find pages cited by the parties.
Source: Leagle
