U.S. v. CHAVEZ, 14-CR-00423-JB (2016)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20160825c71
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE BRIEF STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Brief [CV Doc. 7, CR Doc. 59]. 1 The United States has filed no response in opposition, and the time for doing so has passed. Pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(b), the United States' failure to timely respond constitutes its consent to grant the motion. Accordingly, the motion will be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDE
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE BRIEF STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Brief [CV Doc. 7, CR Doc. 59]. 1 The United States has filed no response in opposition, and the time for doing so has passed. Pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(b), the United States' failure to timely respond constitutes its consent to grant the motion. Accordingly, the motion will be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDER..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE BRIEF
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Brief [CV Doc. 7, CR Doc. 59].1 The United States has filed no response in opposition, and the time for doing so has passed. Pursuant to D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1(b), the United States' failure to timely respond constitutes its consent to grant the motion. Accordingly, the motion will be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion to Enlarge Time to File Brief [CV Doc. 7, CR Doc. 59] is GRANTED. Defendant's brief is due September 6, 2016. The United States' Answer is due October 6, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Motion was filed on August 5, 2016 in the civil case and on August 8, 2016 in the criminal case. The deadline for responding has passed in both cases.
Source: Leagle
