Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Motion of Non-Party Doe, 3:18-mc-80080-JCS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180615a98 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH A FOREIGN SUBPOENA; [PROPOSED] ORDER JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), and Civil Local Rule 6-2, counsel on both sides of this action to quash a foreign subpoena stipulate to an order extending the time to file a reply in support of the motion to quash by two weeks. The current deadline to file a reply is June 13, 2018, and the proposed new d
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH A FOREIGN SUBPOENA; [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), and Civil Local Rule 6-2, counsel on both sides of this action to quash a foreign subpoena stipulate to an order extending the time to file a reply in support of the motion to quash by two weeks. The current deadline to file a reply is June 13, 2018, and the proposed new deadline is June 27, 2018.

* * *

The underlying action was brought by Elizabeth Sines, et al. ("Respondents") on October 11, 2017 in the Western District of Virginia, where it remains pending. (Sines v. Kessler, No. 17-CV-72 (W.D. Va.).) Plaintiffs issued a subpoena to non-party Discord Inc. on January 2, 2018, returnable in this District. Non-party movant Jane Doe filed the instant action to quash that subpoena on May 16, 2018. After seeking and obtaining an extension of time to file its opposition brief, Respondents filed their opposition brief on June 6, 2018.

Movant's current deadline to file a reply in support of the motion to quash is June 13, 2018. Movant requests a two-week extension of time to file the reply brief, meaning the deadline will become June 27, 2018. Respondents stipulate to the new due date.

Aside from Respondents' stipulated request for additional time to file their opposition brief, no other requests for an extension have been made in this action. There is no hearing or argument date scheduled in this case that would be affected by the request. The accompanying declaration of Alex J. Shepard states Respondents' reasons for the requested change. (Civ. L.R. 6-2(a)(1).)

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I, Alex J. Shepard, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the signatories on this document have concurred in this filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer