DECISION AND ORDER

RICHARD J. ARCARA, District Judge.

In this prisoner civil rights case, Defendants Lisson, Crowley, Evertt, Stirk, Blask and Lempke move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), to dismiss the official-capacity claims brought against them in the Plaintiff's amended complaint. See Docket No. 30. Specifically, the Defendants note that the official-capacity claims are barred by New York State's Eleventh Amendment immunity. The Plaintiff, represented by pro bono counsel, has informed the Court that he does not oppose the Defendants' motion. See Docket No. 32.

Because the Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, compensatory damages, and punitive damages—but not injunctive relief—the moving Defendants' motion is granted. See, e.g., Browdy v. Karpe, 131 F. App'x 751, 752-53 (2d Cir. 2005) ("To the extent [plaintiff] sues defendants in their `official capacity' as employees of . . . a state agency, his §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 claims for money damages are barred by the Eleventh Amendment."); In re Deposit Ins. Agency, 482 F.3d 612, 618 ("A plaintiff may avoid the Eleventh Amendment bar to suit and proceed against individual state officers, . . . in their official capacities, provided that his complaint (a) `alleges an ongoing violation of federal law' and (b) `seeks relief properly characterized as prospective.'") (quoting Verizon Md., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n of Md., 535 U.S. 635, 645 (2007)); Abdur-Raheem v. Selsky, 598 F.Supp.2d 367, 369 (W.D.N.Y. 2009) (observing that punitive-damages claim brought against a state official in his official capacity is barred by the Eleventh Amendment). The Plaintiff's official-capacity claims against Defendants Lisson, Crowley, Evertt, Stirk, Blask and Lempke are therefore dismissed.

By separate order, the Court will refer this case to a magistrate judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.