Washington v. United States Department of the Navy, 2:19-cv-01059-RAJ-JRC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20200225e58
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION J. RICHARD CREATURA , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendants' request for an extension of time in which to respond to certain plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dkt. 47. Plaintiffs Citizens of the Ebey's Reserve for a Healthy, Safe, and Peaceful Environment and Paula Spina have moved for a preliminary injunction prohibiting implementation of increased Navy operations until this litigation is reso
Summary: ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION J. RICHARD CREATURA , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendants' request for an extension of time in which to respond to certain plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dkt. 47. Plaintiffs Citizens of the Ebey's Reserve for a Healthy, Safe, and Peaceful Environment and Paula Spina have moved for a preliminary injunction prohibiting implementation of increased Navy operations until this litigation is resol..
More
ORDER RENOTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
J. RICHARD CREATURA, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants' request for an extension of time in which to respond to certain plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dkt. 47.
Plaintiffs Citizens of the Ebey's Reserve for a Healthy, Safe, and Peaceful Environment and Paula Spina have moved for a preliminary injunction prohibiting implementation of increased Navy operations until this litigation is resolved. See Dkt. 29. The matter is currently noted for the Court's consideration on March 6, 2020, so that defendants' response is due March 2, 2020. See Dkt. 29. Defendants request an extension of the response deadline to March 16, 2020, on the basis that they have "several dispositive motions due and hearings on dispositive motions scheduled" in the interim. See Dkt. 47, at 2. The parties have conferred, and none of the plaintiffs oppose defendants' request. See Dkt. 47, at 2.
Having considered defendants' motion and that plaintiffs have no opposition, the Court finds good cause to grant the extension. The motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 29) is renoted to March 20, 2020, and defendants' response is due on or before March 16, 2020.
Source: Leagle
