PEOPLE v. ANTHONY C., 25 N.Y.3d 937 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals of New York
Number: innyco20150331319
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 N.Y.2d 625 , 627 [1986]). On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of App
Summary: OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 N.Y.2d 625 , 627 [1986]). On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appe..
More
OPINION OF THE COURT
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 N.Y.2d 625, 627 [1986]).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Source: Leagle
