Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CORNISH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 14-6920. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150819c33 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER HARVEY BARTLE, III , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendant the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 61) is GRANTED insofar as it seeks judgment in its favor on any allegations of institutional negligence contained in Count Three of the First Amended Complaint; (2
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of defendant the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 61) is GRANTED insofar as it seeks judgment in its favor on any allegations of institutional negligence contained in Count Three of the First Amended Complaint;

(2) the motion of defendant the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment is otherwise DENIED; and

(3) the motion of defendants Christopher Oppman and Joseph Korszniak for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 69) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer