U.S. v. WHEELOCK, 13-136 (MJD/TNL). (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20131018e49
Visitors: 30
Filed: Oct. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2013
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Guy Edward Wheelock's objection to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung to deny Defendant's Motions to Suppress (ECF Nos. 23, 28, 31) on the basis that the administrative subpoenas violated his constitutional and statutory rights to privacy. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that r
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Guy Edward Wheelock's objection to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung to deny Defendant's Motions to Suppress (ECF Nos. 23, 28, 31) on the basis that the administrative subpoenas violated his constitutional and statutory rights to privacy. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that re..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Guy Edward Wheelock's objection to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung to deny Defendant's Motions to Suppress (ECF Nos. 23, 28, 31) on the basis that the administrative subpoenas violated his constitutional and statutory rights to privacy.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Defendant Guy Edward Wheelock's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 19) and Motions to Suppress (Doc. Nos. 23, 28, 31) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
