Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MILLIRON v. COLVIN, 3:11-cv-00656-HU. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20140808828 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation [21] on June 25, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion for 406(b) attorney's fees [18]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo.
More

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation [21] on June 25, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's unopposed motion for § 406(b) attorney's fees [18]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation [21]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for § 406(b) attorney's fees [18] is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer