U.S. v. SMITH, 3:05-cr-13. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120621a89
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se (Doc. No. 62) for reconsideration of the Court's denial (Doc. No. 61: Order) of his motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines relating to crack cocaine triggered by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. The Court has considered the cases cited by the defendant in the instant motion and finds that they do not c
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se (Doc. No. 62) for reconsideration of the Court's denial (Doc. No. 61: Order) of his motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines relating to crack cocaine triggered by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. The Court has considered the cases cited by the defendant in the instant motion and finds that they do not co..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se (Doc. No. 62) for reconsideration of the Court's denial (Doc. No. 61: Order) of his motion for reduction of sentence based on the retroactive amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines relating to crack cocaine triggered by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.
The Court has considered the cases cited by the defendant in the instant motion and finds that they do not compel a different result.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion to reconsider (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
