COLE v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 1:15-cv-00039-MR. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150421f27
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , Director Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 5] and the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc. 7]. The Defendant has moved to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 5]. In response, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 7]. With the filing of the Amended Complaint, the Defendant's pending
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , Director Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 5] and the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc. 7]. The Defendant has moved to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 5]. In response, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 7]. With the filing of the Amended Complaint, the Defendant's pending ..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, Director Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 5] and the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc. 7].
The Defendant has moved to dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 5]. In response, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [Doc. 7]. With the filing of the Amended Complaint, the Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss is rendered moot.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 5] is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
