Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. TELSEY, 3:14-cr-00048-MOC. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20140619a78 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Waive Presentence Report and Set Sentencing Hearing. No objection to such request has been filed. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, and finding pursuant to Rule 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) that the information available in the record enables it to meaningfully exercise its sentencing authority, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defe
More

ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Waive Presentence Report and Set Sentencing Hearing. No objection to such request has been filed. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, and finding pursuant to Rule 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) that the information available in the record enables it to meaningfully exercise its sentencing authority, the court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Waive Presentence Report and Set Sentencing Hearing (#14) is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court is instructed to place this matter on the next available sentencing calendar, taking into account any need the U.S. Marshal may have in transporting such defendant from a BOP facility.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal transport defendant to this district from the BOP facility at which he is housed for purposes of such sentencing hearing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer