Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martinez v. Quest Xpress, 17cv2850 (PAC). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200225c00 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PAUL A. CROTTY , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement, it is, ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed, without prejudice and costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. The Court will sign a Stipulation and Order of Settlement upon receipt from either party. In the event the parties require more than the 30 d
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement, it is,

ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed, without prejudice and costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. The Court will sign a Stipulation and Order of Settlement upon receipt from either party. In the event the parties require more than the 30 days to finalize the settlement, either party shall submit a letter to the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motions, deadlines, conferences, and this case.

SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer