U.S. v. ANDREWS, 7:03-CR-124-F. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140902h30
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Defendant's prose "Motion to Address and Preserve" [DE-51] challenging the validity of his sentence. The proper method for challenging the legality of his sentence is to file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The court therefore DENIES the defendant's letter motion [DE-51). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail the defendant a copy of the 2255 motion to the return address listed on the envelope and the De
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Defendant's prose "Motion to Address and Preserve" [DE-51] challenging the validity of his sentence. The proper method for challenging the legality of his sentence is to file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The court therefore DENIES the defendant's letter motion [DE-51). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail the defendant a copy of the 2255 motion to the return address listed on the envelope and the Def..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's prose "Motion to Address and Preserve" [DE-51] challenging the validity of his sentence. The proper method for challenging the legality of his sentence is to file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court therefore DENIES the defendant's letter motion [DE-51). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail the defendant a copy of the § 2255 motion to the return address listed on the envelope and the Defendant may renew the challenges to his sentence in the § 2255 motion. The Defendant should return the completed § 2255 petition to
Clerk of Court
United States District Court, E.D.N.C.
ATTN: Prisoner Litigation Division
P.O. Box 25670
Raleigh, NC 27611
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
