JOHN MICHAEL VAZQUEZ, District Judge.
On June 21, 2017, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1), challenging his detention since October 27, 2016, by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"). (ECF No. 1, ¶2.) This Court ordered Respondent to answer the petition. (ECF No. 2.) Respondent filed his Response on August 28, 2017. (ECF No. 5.) On March 5, 2018, this Court ordered Respondent to submit supplemental briefing addressing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Jennings v. Rodriguez, 2018 WL 1054878, 583 U.S. ____ (2018). (ECF No. 6.) On March 13, 2018, Respondent submitted a Declaration from Teresa Violano, Deportation Officer with the Immigrations and Customs and Enforcement, indicating that Petitioner was removed to Haiti on October 13, 2017. (ECF No. 7 at 2.) Respondent contends the habeas petition is moot. (ECF No. 7 at 1.)
A habeas petition "generally becomes moot when [a petitioner] is released from custody" because there is no longer "an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision." Vasquez v. Aviles, 639 F. App'x 898, 902 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting DeFoy v. McCullough, 393 F.3d 439, 442 (3d Cir. 2005)). The present petition no longer presents a case or controversy under Article III, § 2 of the United States Constitution because Petitioner is no longer detained by ICE. See id. (finding petition moot where there were no collateral consequences that could be addressed by success on the petition after removal) (citing Abdala v. I.N.S., 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007)). Therefore, the petition is dismissed as moot.