U.S. v. MELTON, 5:14-CR-72-D-1. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140829n12
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the Defendant Kelvin Melton and with no objection form the United States, for an order extending the pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter SHALL BE: Event Date Pre-trial Motions December 4, 2
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge. This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the Defendant Kelvin Melton and with no objection form the United States, for an order extending the pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter SHALL BE: Event Date Pre-trial Motions December 4, 20..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes now before this Court upon motion by the Defendant Kelvin Melton and with no objection form the United States, for an order extending the pre-trial scheduling dates in the above captioned case. For good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the proposed schedule, the deadlines in this matter SHALL BE:
Event Date
Pre-trial Motions December 4, 2014
Pre-trial Motion Responses December 25, 2014 January 5, 2015
Status Conference January 1, 2014 16, 2015
Arraignment and Trial Date(s) To be determined at the
scheduling conference on
October 1, 2014 January 16, 2015
For good cause shown, all time from the date of this order until the date of the status conference is excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 (h) (7) (A) and (h) (7) (B) (ii). The ends ofjustice served by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h) (7) (A). Additionally, this case is also so unusual and complex that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and for the trial itself within the usual time limits. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7) (B) (ii).
SO ORDERED,
Source: Leagle
