U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 15-7209. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20151023280
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Michael Doughty Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams , No. 5:09-cr-00162-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Michael Doughty Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams , No. 5:09-cr-00162-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 20..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Michael Doughty Williams appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Williams, No. 5:09-cr-00162-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
