Decus, Inc. v. Heenan, 16-5849. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180403e06
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2nd day of April 2018, upon considering Defendants' Motion for a new trial or to alter our January 30, 2018 Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 87), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 90) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 87) is GRANTED in part as to reduce the amount of punitive damages awarded to each Plaintiff for the fraud verdict against Defendant Mark Heenan consistent with due
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2nd day of April 2018, upon considering Defendants' Motion for a new trial or to alter our January 30, 2018 Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 87), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 90) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 87) is GRANTED in part as to reduce the amount of punitive damages awarded to each Plaintiff for the fraud verdict against Defendant Mark Heenan consistent with due ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of April 2018, upon considering Defendants' Motion for a new trial or to alter our January 30, 2018 Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 87), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 90) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 87) is GRANTED in part as to reduce the amount of punitive damages awarded to each Plaintiff for the fraud verdict against Defendant Mark Heenan consistent with due process but the Motion is otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle
