U.S. v. LOWRANCE, 12-6251. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120531165
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sandra Denise Lowrance appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowrance, No. 1:08-cr-00010-MR-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pres
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sandra Denise Lowrance appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowrance, No. 1:08-cr-00010-MR-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Denise Lowrance appeals the district court's order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowrance, No. 1:08-cr-00010-MR-3 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
