Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Solano-Patrcio v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:13-cv-01181-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181012674 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ECF No. 204 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Elia Del Carmen Solano-Patricio, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of L.J. Solano and Ima Iliu Flores Zelaya, individually and as legal guardian of L.J. Solano, Jr., by and through their counsel of record, Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. of the Callister Law Group and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sergeant David A
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ECF No. 204

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Elia Del Carmen Solano-Patricio, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of L.J. Solano and Ima Iliu Flores Zelaya, individually and as legal guardian of L.J. Solano, Jr., by and through their counsel of record, Mitchell S. Bisson, Esq. of the Callister Law Group and Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sergeant David Aspiazu, Officer Eugene Dixon, Officer Patrick Gray, and Officer Bradley Temple, by and through their attorney of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq., of the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coifing, that all parties are dismissed with prejudice in the above-referenced matter; and

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that all parties shall bear their own attorney fees and411647051871613361203 costs.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 204] and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer