Rodgers v. Gumbus, 9:19-CV-419 (DNH/ATB). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. New York
Number: infdco20200320a23
Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD , District Judge . Pro se plaintiff Prince Rodgers brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On February 24, 2020, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' unopposed motion for partial dismissal be granted and that defendants Bruen, Barber, and Annucci be dismissed. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the
Summary: DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD , District Judge . Pro se plaintiff Prince Rodgers brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On February 24, 2020, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' unopposed motion for partial dismissal be granted and that defendants Bruen, Barber, and Annucci be dismissed. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation. Based upon a de novo review of the p..
More
DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Prince Rodgers brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 24, 2020, the Honorable Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' unopposed motion for partial dismissal be granted and that defendants Bruen, Barber, and Annucci be dismissed. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.
Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Therefore, it is.
ORDERED that.
Defendants' partial motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and all claims against defendants Annucci, Barber and Bruen are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
