CRENSHAW v. U.S., 7:09-CR-54-1H (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150325c81
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on petitioner's second motion to reconsider. The court previously stayed this matter pending the Fourth Circuit's rehearing en banc of Whiteside . The Fourth Circuit having issued its mandate in the en banc decision, see Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. Dec. 19 2014) (en banc), overruling Whiteside v. United States , 748 F.3d 541 (4th Cir. Apr. 8 2014), the stay is HEREBY LIFTED. T
Summary: ORDER MALCOLM J. HOWARD , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on petitioner's second motion to reconsider. The court previously stayed this matter pending the Fourth Circuit's rehearing en banc of Whiteside . The Fourth Circuit having issued its mandate in the en banc decision, see Whiteside v. United States , 775 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. Dec. 19 2014) (en banc), overruling Whiteside v. United States , 748 F.3d 541 (4th Cir. Apr. 8 2014), the stay is HEREBY LIFTED. Th..
More
ORDER
MALCOLM J. HOWARD, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on petitioner's second motion to reconsider. The court previously stayed this matter pending the Fourth Circuit's rehearing en banc of Whiteside. The Fourth Circuit having issued its mandate in the en banc decision, see Whiteside v. United States, 775 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. Dec. 19 2014) (en banc), overruling Whiteside v. United States, 748 F.3d 541 (4th Cir. Apr. 8 2014), the stay is HEREBY LIFTED.
The court has carefully reviewed petitioner's motion for reconsideration, as well as the record in this matter, and finds no reason to alter or amend its judgment. Id. Therefore, petitioner's second motion to reconsider [DE #293] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
