U.S. v. Middleton, 12-CR-250 (DRH). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20181026e42
Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIS R. HURLEY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Kareem Middleton's June 18, 2018 prose application, made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3583(e) (1), for early termination of his period of supervised release. Having reviewed the reasons set forth in his application as well as the government's response thereto dated August 2, 2018, I am not convinced that his conduct and the interest of justice warrant granting the requested relief based on the information furnish
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIS R. HURLEY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of Kareem Middleton's June 18, 2018 prose application, made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3583(e) (1), for early termination of his period of supervised release. Having reviewed the reasons set forth in his application as well as the government's response thereto dated August 2, 2018, I am not convinced that his conduct and the interest of justice warrant granting the requested relief based on the information furnishe..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DENIS R. HURLEY, District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of Kareem Middleton's June 18, 2018 prose application, made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (1), for early termination of his period of supervised release.
Having reviewed the reasons set forth in his application as well as the government's response thereto dated August 2, 2018, I am not convinced that his conduct and the interest of justice warrant granting the requested relief based on the information furnished. Among other things, Mr. Middleton's representation in his moving papers that "U.S. Probation Officer Miranda Lutke does not oppose [his] request," is not problematic at this point given (1) that there is nothing from Ms. Lutke so indicating and (2) the government maintains that this current supervising probation officer in the Eastern District of California does not agree that Mr. Middleton should be terminated from supervision." Gov't's Aug. 2, 2018 Letter at 1.
In essence, Mr. Middleton has not presented sufficient information for the Court to evaluate his request and, accordingly, his application is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
