TATE v. U.S., 3:13-cv-00283-MOC. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130705b61
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2013
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. Having considered the government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (#3) is GRANTED, and the government's deadline for response is reset for 45 days from issuance of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in United S
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. Having considered the government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (#3) is GRANTED, and the government's deadline for response is reset for 45 days from issuance of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in United St..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. Having considered the government's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the government's Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (#3) is GRANTED, and the government's deadline for response is reset for 45 days from issuance of the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in United States v. Miller, No. 13-6254.
Source: Leagle