U.S. v. INGRAM, 5:12-CR-00020-BR. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120529789
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: May 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the government's motions (1) for an order authorizing its use of defendant's tax returns and return information for the periods 2006 through 2011 and (2) to seal the same. The government has not provided a reason to justify the filing of the substantive motion under seal. The motion to seal is therefore DENIED. In accordance with Local Criminal Rule 55.2, if the government desires the court to consider the substanti
Summary: ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the government's motions (1) for an order authorizing its use of defendant's tax returns and return information for the periods 2006 through 2011 and (2) to seal the same. The government has not provided a reason to justify the filing of the substantive motion under seal. The motion to seal is therefore DENIED. In accordance with Local Criminal Rule 55.2, if the government desires the court to consider the substantiv..
More
ORDER
W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the government's motions (1) for an order authorizing its use of defendant's tax returns and return information for the periods 2006 through 2011 and (2) to seal the same. The government has not provided a reason to justify the filing of the substantive motion under seal. The motion to seal is therefore DENIED. In accordance with Local Criminal Rule 55.2, if the government desires the court to consider the substantive motion, it shall file that motion as a public document on or before 29 May 2012. If it does not, the court will not consider the motion, and the Clerk shall terminate it. If the government timely files the motion as a public document, the court will hear argument on the motion on the date of jury selection.
Source: Leagle
