2 HOUNDS DESIGN, INC. v. BREZINSKI, 3:13-CV-101-RJC-DCK. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140819945
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "2 Hounds Design's Consent Motion To File Response To Summary Judgment Motion Under Seal" (Document No. 72) filed August 15, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of Defendants' counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREF
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "2 Hounds Design's Consent Motion To File Response To Summary Judgment Motion Under Seal" (Document No. 72) filed August 15, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of Defendants' counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFO..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "2 Hounds Design's Consent Motion To File Response To Summary Judgment Motion Under Seal" (Document No. 72) filed August 15, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting consent of Defendants' counsel, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "2 Hounds Design's Consent Motion To File Response To Summary Judgment Motion Under Seal" (Document No. 72) is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
