Filed: Feb. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2020
Summary: ORDER JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . On December 17, 2019, the Court received a pro se motion of defendant Luis Jimenez, dated December 11, 2019, for sentence reduction purportedly under the First Step Act. Subsequently, however, he retained pro bono counsel who has today filed a motion under the First Step Act, which, by defendant's own admission, supersedes the pro se motion. See ECF Nos. 485, 486, 488. Accordingly, the pro se motion is denied without prejudice and the Court w
Summary: ORDER JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . On December 17, 2019, the Court received a pro se motion of defendant Luis Jimenez, dated December 11, 2019, for sentence reduction purportedly under the First Step Act. Subsequently, however, he retained pro bono counsel who has today filed a motion under the First Step Act, which, by defendant's own admission, supersedes the pro se motion. See ECF Nos. 485, 486, 488. Accordingly, the pro se motion is denied without prejudice and the Court wi..
More
ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
On December 17, 2019, the Court received a pro se motion of defendant Luis Jimenez, dated December 11, 2019, for sentence reduction purportedly under the First Step Act. Subsequently, however, he retained pro bono counsel who has today filed a motion under the First Step Act, which, by defendant's own admission, supersedes the pro se motion. See ECF Nos. 485, 486, 488. Accordingly, the pro se motion is denied without prejudice and the Court will now undertake consideration of the counseled motion.
The Clerk of the Court should close the entry bearing docket number 488.
SO ORDERED.
