Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cuaya v. VI Development Group, LLC, 19-CV-4290 (RA). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200109852 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . The parties have notified the Court that mediation was unsuccessful. By separate order, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Cott for general pretrial. It is hereby: ORDERED that, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Judge C
More

ORDER

The parties have notified the Court that mediation was unsuccessful. By separate order, this case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Cott for general pretrial. It is hereby:

ORDERED that, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Judge Cott. If both parties consent to proceed before Judge Cott, they must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, submit to the Court a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Cott rather than before this Court. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be from this Court if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this Order.

If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this Order, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. No adverse consequences will result from the withholding of that consent.

The parties are reminded that, in most cases, settlements of claims under the FLSA must be approved by the Court. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer