U.S. v. PIKE, 5:13-CR-173-FL-1. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150819a29
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . Before the Court is an unopposed motion by the Defendant to modify his conditions of probation to the extent of replacing the condition of 45 days of intermittent confinement with house arrest and electronic monitoring for 120 days. Having considered the premises advanced in the motion, and counsel for the Defendant having represented that counsel for the United States, as well as the U.S. Probation Office do not object, the Court ALLOWS the Defe
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . Before the Court is an unopposed motion by the Defendant to modify his conditions of probation to the extent of replacing the condition of 45 days of intermittent confinement with house arrest and electronic monitoring for 120 days. Having considered the premises advanced in the motion, and counsel for the Defendant having represented that counsel for the United States, as well as the U.S. Probation Office do not object, the Court ALLOWS the Defen..
More
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is an unopposed motion by the Defendant to modify his conditions of probation to the extent of replacing the condition of 45 days of intermittent confinement with house arrest and electronic monitoring for 120 days.
Having considered the premises advanced in the motion, and counsel for the Defendant having represented that counsel for the United States, as well as the U.S. Probation Office do not object, the Court ALLOWS the Defendant's motion and orders the following modification of his conditions of probation:
a. That the Defendant's condition of probation of 45 days of intermittent confinement be replaced with house arrest and electronic monitoring for 120 days; and,
b. That the Defendant is responsible for the cost of house arrest and location monitoring.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
