Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WILLINGHAM v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE NC MAYOR STAFFS, 1:15-CV-119-MR-DCK. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150818946 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of "Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)" (Document No. 10) In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant's motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant Gantt being granted the relie
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of "Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)" (Document No. 10)

In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant's motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant Gantt being granted the relief he seeks, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff may respond to the pending "Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)" (Document No. 10) on or before September 3, 2015. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response may lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer