Johnson v. United States Postal Service, 1:17-CV-01385. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190723816
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR. , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 15 th day of July 2019, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion for a protective order (Doc. 35) is GRANTED; and 2. The plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topic no. 1 shall be limited to employees who (a) worked under MDO Hotchkiss, (b) went through the ninety-day probationary period, and (c) did so between April 1, 2015, and January 1, 2016.
ORDER
JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR., Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of July 2019, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The motion for a protective order (Doc. 35) is GRANTED; and
2. The plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topic no. 1 shall be limited to employees who (a) worked under MDO Hotchkiss, (b) went through the ninety-day probationary period, and (c) did so between April 1, 2015, and January 1, 2016.
Source: Leagle
